Employment Agreement? - employment agreement builder
I currently work for a company, but have a job for a competitor. There was a clause in the contract:
"No competition". The employee may not, without the prior written consent AHGS at any time during the term of this contract and after the date of termination or expiration of this Agreement for six (6) months, either alone or in partnership or in collaboration or relationship with a person as a principal offer, agencies, consultants, employees, shareholders or otherwise make cause whatsoever, to do or counseling or advice on *** or its affiliates, including ***, British Columbia. Be approved, despite the ban on investment in this article include the passive investments of workers. "
Does that mean it can not be used by another company?
I am not a "higher" position.
Saturday, January 2, 2010
Employment Agreement Builder Employment Agreement?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
5 comments:
Not sure! But you can call and ask a labor lawyer by phone, generally give a free consultation
Good luck
This means it can not be employed by another company for 6 months if the new company, the services will be paid directly to today's society in the context.
No matter what position you are in
However, it prohibits employees of a company if the company is not for products or services offered by the original company.
This is somewhat unusual, since the ban on competition in general, two things - that for another company prohibited in similar cases, and working for another company that provides services for the society of origin is available.
In this case, only the prohibition of the latter.
You see only means they do not want to leave and their existing customers, the services offered by the company.
This means it can not be employed by another company for 6 months if the new company, the services will be paid directly to today's society in the context.
No matter what position you are in
However, it prohibits employees of a company if the company is not for products or services offered by the original company.
This is somewhat unusual, since the ban on competition in general, two things - that for another company prohibited in similar cases, and working for another company that provides services for the society of origin is available.
In this case, only the prohibition of the latter.
You see only means they do not want to leave and their existing customers, the services offered by the company.
If possible, talk to your HR person. You can interpret it for you.
I read that the ban is only 6 months to a single company, or its subsidiaries included *** *** British Columbia. Is this the company that allowed its employees without the prior written consent. The best thing is worth a consult a lawyer. Beware of not competing commitments. My son has been caught in one and almost had to go to court over.
Post a Comment